



Origins in Fluid Immersion Microscopy In Microscopy, Fluid immersion increases the resolution of the lens at high magnifications. (The numerical Aperture of the lens is proportional to its numerical aperture which in turn is proportioanl to the refractive index of the fluid). Similarly, LUMINA Scanning Optical fluid has the effect of increasing the resolution of the scan. See Nikon microscopy explanation of oil immersion microscopy. http://www.microscopyu.com/tutorials/java/objectives/immersion/ Fluid immersion in scanning only requires that the film be sandwiched between glass an an optically clear overlay, separated by a microlayer of fluid, as illustrated in the image to the right, which shows the film immersed in fluid between glass on one side and an optically clear overlay with the same index of refraction as the film on the other. Optical Benefits of Fluid Immersion Scanning Cutting reflectivity of film grain: Increased dymamic range, resolution and color saturation Immersion in fluid cuts the reflectivity of the film grain. Light can therefore travel through the grain without some of the transmitted light being lost to reflection. The result is greater briliance and color saturation since the amount of light transmitted in grain rich areas of the film is similar to those of areas that do not have as much grain. The result is better definition of the shadow areas and greater dynamic range and color saturation since more of the light is transmitted through the grain and not lost to reflection. Elimination of Pepper Grain Because there is less refrectivity to the grain, the light is not scattered as it hits the grain,-which results in greater resolution. But since reflectivity and light scattering also magnify the grain, therefore cutting reflectivity cuts pepper grain. The often heard complaint of "pepper grain" only occurs with high quality film scanners like the NIKON 8000 and the Imacon. These scanners use a highly collimated light source, which increases the reflectivity of the grain and 'pepper grain' . Flatbed scanners do not get the blame either, because only a very few of those can pick up grain detail. Drum scanners, in spite of their high resolution, never get blamed for "pepper grain" because they all are fluid scanners and fluid scanning makes the grain more transparent. Elimination / reduction of Dust & Scratches As for dust and scratches, with fluid scanning digital ICE becomes almost redundant. Not using it improves the over all resolution and the quality of the image. There is no question that digital dust reduction techniques degrade the image. Newton Rings- Good bye to the glass holder Newton Rings are caused by reflections beween two surfaces when one of the surfaces is separated from the other by a slight angle. Along the horizontal axis, the reflections interact and either knock each other out or help each other and the result is a series of concentric rings that alternate between dark and light. Newton rings are encountered in old fashioned devices such as the glass holder for the NIKON and a difuser device that used to be used on Minolta scanners. People use these devices in search for a flat film plane not being aware that fluid scanning with the ScanScience kits give them a perfectly flat film plane without degrading the image as the glass holders do. Fluid scanning attains film flatness utilizing the surface tension of the fluid to temporarily 'glue' the film to the glass. The detrimental effects these old devices make them obsolete. For an additional discussion see below. Elimination of Newton Rings: Goodbye to Anti-Newton Glass Since with Fluid Scanning newton rings are a thing of the past, AN glass has outlived its usefulness. AN glass is glass which has corrugations on the surface to break the Newton Rings but is detrimental the image. You would not put AN glass in front of your camera lens. The improvement in image quality between a fluid scan and a glass holder with AN glass is significant. The ScanScience System brings you refraction-free Fluid scanning to film scanners at 20% of the cost of refractive limited offerings. For an additional discussion see below. Limitations of dry scanning , dry enlarging, or dry projecting All these practices are similarly impaired. The degradation of image quality due to the reflections and scattering at the film grain are shared equally by all techniques. Fluid Scanning is not a new technique but it is new to film and flatbed scanners First used in drum scanners and now with the advent of ScanScience it is universally used on all scanners. Because drum scanners are fluid scanners by definition, their uniquely saturated and sharp quality and smoothness made it the choice of connoisseurs. With the advent of ScanScience, all other scanners can benefit in the same measure from fluid immersion scanning. Significantly, users that have access to a drum scanner are finding that fluid scans with their NIKON, IMACON and EPSON scanners rival drum scans.
requires no post operative cleaning and drudgery. In all it saves time as in one operation dust and scratches are dealt with not requiring the application of Digital Ice, which degrades the image. |


| DRY SCANNING |

PRE-CONDITION TO SHARPNESS Depth of Field and Scan Sharpness Scanners optics are close-focusing devices with shallow depth of field. To obtain a sharp image the film must be placed at the scanner's Plane of Optimum Focus (POF). Film, on the other hand, is never flat. Any one that has studied physics knows that the lateral tension required to make a string suspended between two points adopt a perfectly straight shape, is infinite. Film flatness can not be attained by tensioning the film. Overcoming the film's natural tendency to curl requires applying a perpendicular force to the film through the whole area. The surface tension of the fluid, provides that perpendicular force in the way that no tensioning devices such as spacers provided with specialty holders can. |
| Scanner Holder > Other HOLDERS > |
| FLUID SCANNING - ScanScience > |
MORE ABOUT REFRACTION IN FLATBED AND FILM SCANNERS,
Refraction is the bending of light as it travels from one medium to another with a different refractive index. . Refraction degrades the image since not all light rays are perpendicular to the glass, and instead of pinpoint landing on the sensor as a perpendicular light ray would, it is scattered over several sensors. This corruption of the original image impairs resolution, contrast and saturation. To see the effect of fluid scanning look at any of the several images provided. The fluid scans are notable because of their higher resolution and contrast, dynamic range and greater color saturation than dry scans. REFRACTION AND THE FLATBED SCANNER In Flatbed Scanners the glass comes with the package, and the refraction of the glass bed is unavoidable. Fluid scanning involves an additional glass but the glass need not be in the path between the light emerging from the film and the optics. Epson V 750 scanners are provided with a wet mount tray which require that the film be placed on top of the glass when wet mnounted. This results in double refraction caused the In additional chunk of glass effectively subtracting some of the benefits gained by fluid scanning. ScanScience's simple answer to the problem is to provide an adapter that avoids glass between the film and the sensors. The fluid mounting plate faces the lamp, with the film being placed under the glass. The image going to the sensors is untainted by additional refraction from the fluid mounting plate. REFRACTION AND THE FILM SCANNER Film Scanners have the inherent advantage over flatbeds that they are not refraction limited. The absence of the extra glass, potentially gives film scanners an edge but does not solve the problem of dry film curvature. SHOULD YOU USE A GLASS HOLDER? Owners of film scanners try overcoming the film flatness problem by using glass holders. It is physically impossible to attain film flatness with glass only on one side of the film, unless the film curves in such a way as to have its curvature against the glass. When this happens the result is Newton Rings. ScanScience's simple answer to the problem is fluid scanning. With the glass on the side of the lamp so that there is no glass between the film and the sensors. This results in the flatbed scanner not being subjected to double refraction, and the Film scanner to no refraction at all, preserving its inherent advantages.
AN glass has a microscopically rough surface intended to break up Newton's interference reflections which cause Newton rings. When the light reflected from two surfaces at a slight angle and a short distance to each other meet, it can interact constructively or destructively according to their phase, causing Newton Rings. AN Glass therefore can not be perfectly clear glass: if placed in front of the lens it would be detrimental to the image. Taking a picture using AN glass as a filter will show what effect AN has on the image. When AN glass is part of the film carrier in a film scanner, the film is placed against the glass which is in the light path from the film to the scanner sensors. This not only adds the additional refraction of the glass but the degrading effect of an AN surface to the degradation of the image. A full discussion of Newton Rings appears in the ScanScience manual provided with the Kits. |
| ScanScience Innovators in Fluid Scanning. Our Innovative Products power the World's Finest Scanners |
